mail/opendkim-devel2.11.0.b2.49_3

databases/lmdb: allow to install both 0.x and 1.x together

LMDB 1.0 and the legacy 0.9 ABI cannot be mixed, the datanase format are
incompatibles as well.

Rename or relocate everything databases/lmdb0 installs so that it no
longer overlaps with databases/lmdb:
- the utilities are now mdb_copy0, mdb_dump0, mdb_load0 and mdb_stat0
- the header is include/lmdb0/lmdb.h
- the linker name is liblmdb0.so, the shared object keeps its ABI name
  liblmdb.so.0 so already linked programs are unaffected
- the pkg-config file is lmdb0.pc

A compatibility prefix holding the previous layout is also installed
under ${PREFIX}/lmdb0/ (include/, lib/ and libdata/pkgconfig/) so that
build systems which expect to find lmdb.h and -llmdb relative to a
single directory only need a path change.

Now all ports should migrate to lmdb 1.X and use the lmdb 0.9 port to ease
in the migration path, lmdb, the lmdb 0.x is supposed to get removed at
some point.

Approved by:	mat (portmgr)
Reviewed by:	mat
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D60741

databases/rrdtool: Bump revisions after 1.11.0

databases/lmdb0: Add port for LMDB 0.9.x legacy ABI

LMDB 1.0 introduced an incompatible on-disk format change and subtle
API breakage: applications that compiled cleanly against 1.0 headers
could fail silently at run time. Known affected ports include dns/knot3,
mail/bogofilter, and mail/postfix; the postfix issue has been confirmed
upstream. Linux distributions such as Arch Linux have observed the same
breakage. Samba can also be affected in certain configurations.

Because the regression is not detectable in an -exp build run -- the
postfix failure only manifests at run time, and bogofilter was caught
only because post-build self-tests happen to exercise this path -- we
cannot rely on package builds to validate the 1.0 upgrade.

This commit introduces databases/lmdb0 as a holding port for the 0.9.35
release, pinned to the 0.x branch with PORTSCOUT=limit:^0. and mutually
conflicting with databases/lmdb, which retains 1.0. The two packages
cannot be installed simultaneously, but having lmdb0 available means:

* Ports known to require the 0.9 ABI can declare an explicit dependency
  on databases/lmdb0 until they are validated against 1.0.
* Users with existing databases in the 0.9 format can still access the
  mdb_dump and mdb_load utilities to migrate data before upgrading.
* The package conflict prevents accidental mixing.

All 50 direct dependents of databases/lmdb are redirected to
databases/lmdb0 for now with a PORTREVISION bump, effectively restoring
the tree to the state prior to the LMDB 1.0 update. Once all dependent
ports are validated against LMDB 1.0, they will be moved back to
databases/lmdb and databases/lmdb0 will be removed.

PR:             ports/296530

mail/opendkim-devel: Update to latest snapshot and enable Lua flavors

- Update to 2.11.0-Beta2-49 (commit 1c7a9f47c6)
- Enable Lua flavors support
- Remove obsolete or unsupported options: ADSP_LISTS, LDNS and LUA_ONLY_SIGNING
- Remove patches that have been merged upstream

PR:		295791
Approved by:	hrs (mentor, blanket)

security/libsodium: Update to 1.0.21

The API remains compatible but bumping all dependent ports as SHLIB
has changed.

Changelog: https://github.com/jedisct1/libsodium/releases/tag/1.0.21-RELEASE
Security: https://00f.net/2025/12/30/libsodium-vulnerability/
PR: 279347

*/*: Return to pool

I'll be away from keyboard soon and am not sure if I will return. So
return all ports that I currently maintain to pool hoping new
volunteers take care of them.

*/*: Bump consumers of databases/rrdtool

New version of rrdtool in tree

mail/opendkim-devel: Add patch to fix bug related to Lua

PR:		279811
Reported by:	Yasuhito FUTATSUKI
Obtained from:	https://github.com/trusteddomainproject/OpenDKIM/pull/201

mail/opendkim-devel: Add new port

* Add mail/opendkim-devel, development snapshot of OpenDKIM.
* Mark mail/opendkim and mail/opendkim-devel as CONFLICTS_INSTALL with
  each other